Queensland is to start putting recycled water in the drinking water supply from late next year - or at least the south east part of the state. There was going to be a plebiscite on the issue in March, but the Premier yesterday announced that the drought was so bad that there was no point in debating the issue, it was going to go ahead.
Now, even though the country is going through a one in a thousand year drought apparently, and the dam levels around Brisbane are almost nudging under the 20% mark, there is the makings of a real debate about this all. The vox pop polls they have been having in the rest of the country makes it seem that Queensland will become less of a tourist destination, that we will be drinking toilet water, that the property prices will fall as less people want to move here, and most tellingly, none of the other states are contemplating following The Smart State's initiative - at least publicly.
Federally, the Prime Minister and Water Minister, are more supportive of the concept.
I have to say, the reaction by the recycled water naysayers surprises me. Driest continent in the world, one in a thousand year drought - whether it is being caused by climate change, El Nino or whatever is beside the point frankly - I am surprised that there is even a debate about the issue.
The filtration process they recycle the water with makes it cleaner than normal tap water, as the referendum organisers in Toowoomba tried to tell everyone there, and really, how clean is normal dam or river water anyways. Think of all that dirt that they have to get out of there anyways - has anyone seen the crystal clear Brisbane River lately? - and remember, all the fish and stuff in the water do their business in it anyways.
It's not as if anyone will be pissing directly into mouths - well, outside a few select clubs in Fortitude Valley, at least.
Getting it clean again, there is talk between Canberra and the state capitals of depoliticising water issues. Of there either being federal responsibility for it, as proposed by the Libs, or a cooperative approach, as put forward by presidential candidate Rudd, aka the Labor Party.
Depoliticising water, as if that will happen. You have the government saying yes we will invest ten billion dollars into water policy restructuring and infrastructure and the like, but unless the states give over responsibility - which doesn't look like it's a goer at this stage - there won't be any money at all. As for the opposition, federal like, well, cooperation would be a good idea, but it is all still nice and fluffy and all, and you aren't in power yet.
This water thing is going to get a lot worse before it gets better, and Brisbane won't be the only city in the country recycling water I would suggest in the next five year timeframe.
Paul
Now, even though the country is going through a one in a thousand year drought apparently, and the dam levels around Brisbane are almost nudging under the 20% mark, there is the makings of a real debate about this all. The vox pop polls they have been having in the rest of the country makes it seem that Queensland will become less of a tourist destination, that we will be drinking toilet water, that the property prices will fall as less people want to move here, and most tellingly, none of the other states are contemplating following The Smart State's initiative - at least publicly.
Federally, the Prime Minister and Water Minister, are more supportive of the concept.
I have to say, the reaction by the recycled water naysayers surprises me. Driest continent in the world, one in a thousand year drought - whether it is being caused by climate change, El Nino or whatever is beside the point frankly - I am surprised that there is even a debate about the issue.
The filtration process they recycle the water with makes it cleaner than normal tap water, as the referendum organisers in Toowoomba tried to tell everyone there, and really, how clean is normal dam or river water anyways. Think of all that dirt that they have to get out of there anyways - has anyone seen the crystal clear Brisbane River lately? - and remember, all the fish and stuff in the water do their business in it anyways.
It's not as if anyone will be pissing directly into mouths - well, outside a few select clubs in Fortitude Valley, at least.
Getting it clean again, there is talk between Canberra and the state capitals of depoliticising water issues. Of there either being federal responsibility for it, as proposed by the Libs, or a cooperative approach, as put forward by presidential candidate Rudd, aka the Labor Party.
Depoliticising water, as if that will happen. You have the government saying yes we will invest ten billion dollars into water policy restructuring and infrastructure and the like, but unless the states give over responsibility - which doesn't look like it's a goer at this stage - there won't be any money at all. As for the opposition, federal like, well, cooperation would be a good idea, but it is all still nice and fluffy and all, and you aren't in power yet.
This water thing is going to get a lot worse before it gets better, and Brisbane won't be the only city in the country recycling water I would suggest in the next five year timeframe.
Paul